На информационном ресурсе применяются рекомендательные технологии (информационные технологии предоставления информации на основе сбора, систематизации и анализа сведений, относящихся к предпочтениям пользователей сети "Интернет", находящихся на территории Российской Федерации)

Feedbox

12 подписчиков

The Empty Seat At The Royal Wedding Wasn’t For Princess Diana, But It Followed Another British Tradition

Author: Mallory Carra / Source: Bustle

During Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s wedding on May 19, eagle-eyed viewers noticed that there was an empty seat at the royal wedding next to Prince William, the Duke of Cambridge. Many media outlets and watchers speculated that the seat was kept empty for Princess Diana, however, it turns out that wasn’t the case.

Later on Saturday, May 19, Daily Mail royals reporter Rebecca English confirmed via Twitter that Buckingham Palace said the : it was for Queen Elizabeth II.

English tweeted:

Btw – I’ve seen some reports about the spare seat by Prince William in the chapel as having being left in memory of Princess Diana. It wasn’t empty for that reason. The seat in front of the Queen is always left empty, I am told by BP

The “BP” in that tweet likely stands for Buckingham Palace, the residence of the Queen of the United Kingdom.

Another Twitter user named @theRoyalBoxBlog asked English, “

?” and English replied:

“She needs to be seen — and the seat she was sitting in today is her favourite seat in that chapel, apparently!”

Of course, Queen would get first dibs on the seating choice for her grandson’s wedding. After all, she is the Queen.

Rumors of the empty chair’s symbolism circulated throughout the morning, with many viewers getting emotional that Prince Harry made sure the seat was left open for his late mother, the Princess of Wales. As touching as…

Click here to read more

The post The Empty Seat At The Royal Wedding Wasn’t For Princess Diana, But It Followed Another British Tradition appeared first on FeedBox.

Ссылка на первоисточник
наверх